The circular on graduate admission in 2011 issue that the candidates who fail the ideological and moral assessment are not allowed attending graduate school. It arouses the argument of lots of people in a short time. Mainly, there are two sides. One agrees and the other disagrees. Both of them have their own opinion.
2011年研究生招生人提出了思想品德考核不合格者不錄取的通知。它在短期內(nèi)就引起了大量的爭(zhēng)論。主要有兩個(gè)方面。同意和不同意。他們都有他們自己的見(jiàn)解。
One the one hand, the agree side thinks moral is the most important. As we all know that China is a country encouraging morality. Postgraduate belongs to the people receiving high education, which represent the group of high - quality talents in China. If the admission of postgraduate do not strict, the development of postgraduate will be more difficult. Even happen the thing “A Mouse excrement bad gruel.” Besides, students’ quality is more important than their talent. So, why not cut them before anything bad happens.
一方面，贊成的一方認(rèn)為道德是最重要的。我們都知道，中國(guó)一直都提倡道德。研究生是屬于接受高等教育的一類(lèi)人，代表了中國(guó)的高素質(zhì)人才。如果研究生招生不嚴(yán)格，會(huì)給研究生的培養(yǎng)帶來(lái)很大的困難。甚至?xí)�發(fā)生一顆老鼠屎壞了一鍋粥的情況。除此之外學(xué)生的素質(zhì)要比才能重要。為什么不在事情變?cè)阒�前就處理掉呢�?br /> On the other hand, the opposite side considers the equality. They think to vale a person’s morality is very subjectivity. It is easy to make unfair result. For example, a student has relatives in the adjudicators can achieve high marks for sure. Or students can bribe the adjudicators by money or power. It is very unfair for the poor or honest students.
另一方面，反對(duì)的一方考慮的是平等問(wèn)題。他們認(rèn)為衡量一個(gè)人的道德是很主觀的。這很容易造成不公平的結(jié)果。例如，一個(gè)學(xué)生在評(píng)委中有關(guān)系就肯定可以得到高分。學(xué)生也可以用金錢(qián)或權(quán)力賄賂裁判。這對(duì)貧窮的學(xué)生和誠(chéng)實(shí)的學(xué)生是很不公平的。
To sum up, both sides have their reasonable reasons. As far as I am concerned, I don’t agree with it. Since everyone has put their effort on it, they deserve to have an equal competition.
綜上所述，雙方都有其合理的理由。就我而言，我是站在反對(duì)的一方。既然每個(gè)人都對(duì)此付出了努力，他們就應(yīng)該公平競(jìng)爭(zhēng)。